This is one of my favorite categories of articles: a significant expansion of our understanding of the past. History is so exciting and it's a horrible shame that the experience of high school history classes teaches students the opposite. I wish more HS teachers knew how to make the subject engaging.
On this in particular, someone linked to a map of the roads of the Roman Empire created in the style of modern transportation maps (think subways) a few years ago. I paid five bucks (I think, might have been more) for a high quality version of the file suitable for printing. I have a giant print of it framed on the wall. It's one of my favorite things because it's such a clever crossover of historical timelines.
The person I paid for it (blog owner) was surprised that I found it. They thought that they had removed it from their blog and asked me how I got to it so it could be removed. I didn't check to confirm, just letting you know you likely can't get the file anymore and I didn't create it so I won't share it. Sorry for teasing it when you can't get your own. It's pretty great.
Please listen to Isaac Moreno Gallo. 99% of the Roman Roads had no big stones on it. Only near big cities you have the stone pavement, basically in the cemetery that was outside town alongside the road.
People with very little idea about engineering wrote the textbooks of the past and some of the wrong ideas are transmitted even today.
If they're mapped, by definition, they're not lost.
Having knowledge in theory, somewhere and having knowledge avaiable where people can access it, is not the same thing.
This is one of my favorite categories of articles: a significant expansion of our understanding of the past. History is so exciting and it's a horrible shame that the experience of high school history classes teaches students the opposite. I wish more HS teachers knew how to make the subject engaging.
On this in particular, someone linked to a map of the roads of the Roman Empire created in the style of modern transportation maps (think subways) a few years ago. I paid five bucks (I think, might have been more) for a high quality version of the file suitable for printing. I have a giant print of it framed on the wall. It's one of my favorite things because it's such a clever crossover of historical timelines.
The person I paid for it (blog owner) was surprised that I found it. They thought that they had removed it from their blog and asked me how I got to it so it could be removed. I didn't check to confirm, just letting you know you likely can't get the file anymore and I didn't create it so I won't share it. Sorry for teasing it when you can't get your own. It's pretty great.
Edit: spelling / tense
Related. Others?
Itiner-e: the Google Maps of Roman Roads - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45864341 - Nov 2025 (42 comments)
Also:
Roman Roads (2017) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40597216 - June 2024 (157 comments)
Subway-style maps of roads of the Roman Empire - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23781879 - July 2020 (27 comments)
'Lost' Roads of Ancient Rome Discovered with 3D Laser Scanners - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11094744 - Feb 2016 (5 comments)
Link to the actual atlas built by the group [1]
[1] https://itiner-e.org/
https://archive.md/8jQ6G
oh man, what a horrible infographic.
Please listen to Isaac Moreno Gallo. 99% of the Roman Roads had no big stones on it. Only near big cities you have the stone pavement, basically in the cemetery that was outside town alongside the road.
People with very little idea about engineering wrote the textbooks of the past and some of the wrong ideas are transmitted even today.
If they're mapped, by definition, they're not lost.
Having knowledge in theory, somewhere and having knowledge avaiable where people can access it, is not the same thing.
In other words, maybe unneccesary pedantry?
I mean... they are lost no more