I had a similar project back in August when I realised my DB's performance (Postgres) was blocking me from implementing features users commonly ask for (querying out to 30 days of historical uptime data).
I was already blown away at the performance (200ms to query what Postgres was doing in 500-600ms), but then I realized I hadn't put an index on the Clickhouse table. Now the query returns in 50-70ms, and that includes network time.
Seems weird not to use Redis as the buffering layer + minutely cron job. Seems a lot simpler than installing Kafka + Vector.
BTW you could've used e.g. kittenhouse (https://github.com/YuriyNasretdinov/kittenhouse, my fork) or just a simpler buffer table, with 2 layers and a larger aggregation period than in the example.
Alternatively, you could've used async insert functionality built into ClickHouse: https://clickhouse.com/docs/optimize/asynchronous-inserts . All of these solutions are operationally simpler than Kafka + Vector, although obviously it's all tradeoffs.
There were a lot of simpler options that came to mind while reading through this, frankly.
But I imagine the writeup eschews myriad future concerns and does not entirely illustrate the pressure and stress of trying to solve such a high-scale problem.
Ultimately, going with a somewhat more complex solution that involves additional architecture but has been tried and tested by a 3rd party that you trust can sometimes be the more fitting end result. Assurance often weighs more than simplicity, I think.
While kittenhouse is, unfortunately, abandonware (even though you can still use it and it works), you can't say the same about e.g. async inserts in ClickHouse: it's a very simple and robust solution to tackle exactly the problem the PHP (and some other languages') backends often face when trying to use ClickHouse
Thanks for sharing. I really enjoyed the breakdown, and great to see small tech companies helping each other out!
Thanks for sharing I enjoyed reading this.
Currently at the millions stage with https://mailpace.com relying mostly on Postgres
Tbh this terrifies me! We don’t just have to log the requests but also store the full emails for a few days, and they can be up to 50 mib in total size.
But it will be exciting when we get there!
How does Clickhouse compare to Druid, Pinot or Star Tree?
Here's a good performance study by OneHouse comparing Clickhouse, StarRocks, Trino:
Sai from ClickHouse here. Very compelling story! Really love your emphasis on using the right tool for the right job - power of row vs column stores.
We recently added a MySQL/MariaDB CDC connector in ClickPipes on ClickHouse Cloud. This would have simplified your migration from MariaDB.
https://clickhouse.com/docs/integrations/clickpipes/mysql https://clickhouse.com/docs/integrations/clickpipes/mysql/so...
Great write-up!
I had a similar project back in August when I realised my DB's performance (Postgres) was blocking me from implementing features users commonly ask for (querying out to 30 days of historical uptime data).
I was already blown away at the performance (200ms to query what Postgres was doing in 500-600ms), but then I realized I hadn't put an index on the Clickhouse table. Now the query returns in 50-70ms, and that includes network time.
Seems weird not to use Redis as the buffering layer + minutely cron job. Seems a lot simpler than installing Kafka + Vector.
BTW you could've used e.g. kittenhouse (https://github.com/YuriyNasretdinov/kittenhouse, my fork) or just a simpler buffer table, with 2 layers and a larger aggregation period than in the example.
Alternatively, you could've used async insert functionality built into ClickHouse: https://clickhouse.com/docs/optimize/asynchronous-inserts . All of these solutions are operationally simpler than Kafka + Vector, although obviously it's all tradeoffs.
There were a lot of simpler options that came to mind while reading through this, frankly.
But I imagine the writeup eschews myriad future concerns and does not entirely illustrate the pressure and stress of trying to solve such a high-scale problem.
Ultimately, going with a somewhat more complex solution that involves additional architecture but has been tried and tested by a 3rd party that you trust can sometimes be the more fitting end result. Assurance often weighs more than simplicity, I think.
While kittenhouse is, unfortunately, abandonware (even though you can still use it and it works), you can't say the same about e.g. async inserts in ClickHouse: it's a very simple and robust solution to tackle exactly the problem the PHP (and some other languages') backends often face when trying to use ClickHouse
Thanks for sharing. I really enjoyed the breakdown, and great to see small tech companies helping each other out!
Thanks for sharing I enjoyed reading this.
Currently at the millions stage with https://mailpace.com relying mostly on Postgres
Tbh this terrifies me! We don’t just have to log the requests but also store the full emails for a few days, and they can be up to 50 mib in total size.
But it will be exciting when we get there!
How does Clickhouse compare to Druid, Pinot or Star Tree?
Here's a good performance study by OneHouse comparing Clickhouse, StarRocks, Trino:
https://www.onehouse.ai/blog/apache-spark-vs-clickhouse-vs-p...
Druid is real-time analytics, similar to Clickhouse. StarRocks is best at Joins - Clickhouse is not good for joins.