>Why is this a problem now if it wasn’t in the 90s?
I dont think his answer is correct. Real reason is there was no stupid bitrates and unrealistic bit depths craze back then. /insert mandatory Monty Montgomery from xiph explaining how A/D D/A and hearing works.
>hardware that hit these sample rates and bit depths was mostly used by professionals
professionals used Firewire audio interfaces, USB latency wasnt good enough
This article is formatted weirdly. At one point the author just says "bar chart of..." And there's no chart. There were a lot of what felt like missing graphics but they had descriptions.
Edit: thanks to a reply, seems the images just aren't loading
>Why is this a problem now if it wasn’t in the 90s?
I dont think his answer is correct. Real reason is there was no stupid bitrates and unrealistic bit depths craze back then. /insert mandatory Monty Montgomery from xiph explaining how A/D D/A and hearing works.
>hardware that hit these sample rates and bit depths was mostly used by professionals
professionals used Firewire audio interfaces, USB latency wasnt good enough
This article is formatted weirdly. At one point the author just says "bar chart of..." And there's no chart. There were a lot of what felt like missing graphics but they had descriptions.
Edit: thanks to a reply, seems the images just aren't loading
You're seeing the alt text, because the images are hosted on Google, and opening one (such as https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXdr83VwXrJQy... ) gives you an error.