487

Level S4 solar radiation event

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/goes-proton-flux

If anyone is interested in what "G4" means in context, here's the scale: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

14 hours agojjcm

Interestingly, there are about 100 events of this severity (G4) per cycle, and a single cycle lasts 11 years. This means there are about nine G4 events on average per year.

9 hours agoHelmut10001

Note, however, that the solar cycle [0] is so named due to its minimum and maximum: the most severe events will be clustered around the maximum, rather than spread out over the whole cycle (as your comment suggested) - so the "nine G4 events on average per year" is mathematically true but not so helpful.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle

6 hours agotomr_stargazer

The scale seems capped at a pretty low upper end? It feels like with all the mindbogglingly huge numbers usually involved when talking about space, there must be much, much worse events possible. Is it just that we don't know enough about them due to lack of experience that these aren't included?

4 hours ago9dev

G4: " Induced pipeline currents affect preventive measures, HF radio propagation sporadic..."

G5: " Pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days..."

12 hours ago8bitsrule

Sam Altman has entered an agreement to acquire all future G4 and G5 energy

6 hours agomcs5280

"Cool! What's G13 do?" - Bill Hicks

Looks like G5 is the highest level and the scale system is used by NOAA.

11 hours agogexla

>"Cool! What's G13 do?" - Bill Hicks

I hear that bit in my head every time a new plane or weapon designation is announced, glad to hear it stuck with others too.

3 hours agoserf

HF propagation is flaky at the best of times. It's affected by the day/night cycle and by the weather.

4 hours agodmurray

"Free Energy!"

11 hours agogosub100

I wonder if they’re still putting out music …

10 minutes agotclancy

That's the nice thing about solar power, but it's still a limited time offer

7 hours agoautoexec

We are at kp 8.67. The Carrington event was a kp 9

12 hours agoirthomasthomas

I am not an expert, but it’s worth noting that the kp index has a maximum value of 9. So though the Carrington event had a kp of 9, its intensity on the related (but not capped) HP30/HP60 scale [1] would likely have been higher. [1] https://kp.gfz.de/en/hp30-hp60

12 hours agoianruh

Queue Chernobyl documentary clip measuring the radiation as low because that’s as high the meter went

12 hours agorepeekad

s/queue/cue/

Though I suppose you could also queue it.

10 hours agowyldfire

Meant the first and people should do the second, Chernobyl on HBO is great.

It’s also technically not a documentary but historical drama.

6 hours agorepeekad

3.6 roentgen. Not great, not terrible!

11 hours agocelsoazevedo

here, take one ö

8 hours agoanonymous344

Everybody's a diacritic.

6 hours agowyldfire

*skin sloughs off*

10 hours agoqingcharles

You didn't see any graphite because it's not there!

7 hours agoanonym29

This is also related to weaker solar events leading to stronger Earth storms due to Earth's weakening magnetic field.

9 hours agokeepamovin

Have we been having these more recently?

I don't ever recall seeing these in the news so frequently. It feels like there are several a year now. A decade ago, never.

And I also never remember seeing Aurora at my latitudes.

Do we just have better sensing now, or is there some cycle on a period longer than a few years? Or maybe I'm crazy and just never noticed.

11 hours agoechelon

Mid to late 2025 was the peak of an 11 year solar cycle (25th one since we've started keeping track). We're on the trailing end of that peak activity now, which is why the past year/several months has seemed so active compared to recent years past, and should decrease significantly (in frequency and intensity) as 2026 progresses.

There was also a fairly significant geomagnetic storm back in November of 2025 as well.

You can see the data here at NOAA's Space Weather site https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression

8 hours ago0manrho

We've just passed the 11 year peak - the sun spot activity has a period of around 11 years.

11 hours agoawesome_dude

> Biological: Unavoidable radiation hazard to astronauts on EVA; passengers and crew in high-flying aircraft at high latitudes may be exposed to radiation risk.

Anyone have a sense of magnitude for this advisory? How much more radiation should an airline passenger expect to receive during a G4 event than normal?

11 hours agonon-

roughly up to 5-10 times the normal dose.

11 hours agoinatreecrown2

sounds "it's okey" ?

8 hours agoNeoInHacker

Nowhere near lifetime occupational dose limits.

8 hours agojojobas

Looks like we get these for about 60 days for periods lasting 11 years.

13 hours agoxeckr

This was an S4 event, however.

5 hours agovelocity3230

Belay that. The G-value was high too.

5 hours agovelocity3230

so more of a 'bad storm here and there' level?

12 hours agoneonmagenta
[deleted]
8 hours ago

We had intense aurora in Berlin, Germany. Green clouds dancing in the sky levels. Started around 22:10 local time or a bit earlier, and at this point there's only a faint red/green glow remaining.

14 hours agobartman

Yeah, there were auroras even as far south as Munich. Maybe not as intense, but it's the first aurora I ever saw, so I can't really judge...

13 hours agorob74

I am south-west of Munich and with a perfect clear sky I could only see stars, one meteor, and that's it.

12 hours agoccozan

Can confirm, I've seen pink/green glow over Berlin Sky (and pictures as well)

7 hours agomadduci

Just spend an hour outsite (Northern Germany, 01:00 MET). Unfortunately nothing to report, neither visual nor on camera. Maybe I just went to late and missed the show. I hope you habe more luck in Canada and the US!

12 hours agofluxflexer

I'm Berlin was around 22-23 o'clock visible

7 hours agomadduci

It's pretty subtle right now here in NL but I can still see it with the naked eye. Mostly greenish haze that fades in and out.

12 hours agojacquesm

ahh I just went outside (south of Utrecht) and saw nothing. Maybe too much light pollution.

8 hours agoCalRobert

I'm lucky in that I was close to the IJsselmeer.

2 hours agojacquesm

I was just out at a dog park and saw nothing! We have clear skies. I can't believe I missed this.

12 hours agokarim79

Also seen in the Netherlands!

13 hours agopaulmist

Could you see it from the inner city or only closer to the edges?

13 hours agoTachyooon

Friends who live in Kreuzberg and Friedrichshain could see it pretty well. I'm a bit further south within Berlin where skies are minimally darker, but between 10pm and 11pm it was so bright that light pollution didn't matter.

Funnily enough, despite having lots of alerts set up it was my mom who texted me from northern Brandenburg as she spotted it after getting an alert from RegenRadar, of all apps...

12 hours agobartman

It's amazing to hear it's visible in such a big city. I don't have a good intuition for all the metrics that describe how strong this storm was/is, but when put like this it hits home.

Nice to hear earth weather apps also work great in space haha. I'll keep that in mind when I set up my own notifications. Hopefully I have time to look into it before the next storm hits.

10 hours agoTachyooon

Saw it in Fhain as well over Ostkreuz station

5 hours agothrawn0r

I tought I was seeing aurora borealis here at 4 am local time in the neighboring Grand Duchy of Luxemburg but it was just visual pollution due to lights from a city.

9 hours agoTacticalCoder

Oh really? Oh no I missed it! Is it going to happen again today?

6 hours agomarc_g

Nice, you can already see some solar flares in Austria again.

https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/kleinfleisskees/

https://www.foto-webcam.eu/

14 hours agomiduil

Oh wow! https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/ederplan/2026/01/20/0000

And up at the top right, left to "Latest" you can skip the time back and forth at 10 minute intervals. And then jump back like 10 images, what a beauty.

You can even see Starlink satellites https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/ederplan/2026/01/19/1820

13 hours agoqwertox

Those images around 19:00 are amazing. Thanks for sharing.

13 hours agocaseyohara

Our network router in our radio station started acting crazy at 22:00:40 Europe/Ljubljana time. Uptime monitoring via HTTPS reported downtime for 5 minutes, but our radio archive that records audio over LiveWire recorded some bitcrushing effects for 5 minues. Maybe our Mikrotik hEX was flipping some bits? Recording from the radio archive: https://splet.4a.si./dir/solar.mp3

38 minutes agojesprenj

I had the most intensely coloured lights visible in the west of Ireland. I've seen them a few times before but never like this. Phones were capturing them in video not just long exposures.

Not sure what the best service is to be alerted ahead of time. Apparently it'll be strong here again at 6am according to some of the apps some random people were waving around.

13 hours agofrzen

There are several apps that do a good job of alerting users. I use "Aurora Pro", which I prefer because it checks cloud cover and lets you set alert thresholds based on viewing probability.

13 hours agoortusdux

I woke up to a notification from aurora pro today, I'd forgotten I had the app. This would explain it

13 hours agoKing-Aaron

Any tips on best practices in how one can protect homelab rigs from a Carrington level event? Let's say we were given two days notice that the mother of all S4s was inbound. Just switch everything off?

What if one of my homelabs needed 100% uptime to meet my wife's SLA for messaging? Is this able to be protected?

11 hours agoandrewinardeer

Not much? As I understand it, the major effects are in very long wires. Long wires can have get massive induced currents. But your homelab is unlikely to have long wires or very large loops. Ethernet wires are limited to 100m, and unshielded Ethernet is transformer-isolated to well over 1kV.

Shielded Ethernet could plausibly have issues with induced current on the shield. PoE might be less immune than ordinary Ethernet depending on what you’re doing with it, although well-behaved devices should be isolated. If you have a cable ISP, the cable shield might get toasty, although it’s likely to be grounded close enough to your house that any damage will be upstream.

Your 100% uptime will be tricky if your ISP goes down or you lose power.

10 hours agoamluto

AFAIK the risk is for long transmission lines. So your equipment at home is not really in any danger, as long as there is not a major surge on the transmission lines that makes it all the way to your house. If that happens, well, losing the home lab is probably no longer the issue.

10 hours agorootusrootus

Make sure you have a surge protector or ups, in case it makes the power grid go funky. Which you should have anyway.

Also, it could be a convenient excuse to upgrade to fiber internet service if you haven't already. (Yes, excuse. Equipment should have more than good enough isolation to not care.)

10 hours agotbrownaw

Even if you don't have fiber all the way into your house, most cable internet terminates pretty close to the home these days. It kind of has to, since bandwidth has gone way up and as a result they can't put very many subscribers on the same termination system.

We didn't really understand this kind of thing when the Carrington event happened, so nobody knows for sure, but estimates for induced voltage on long conductors are usually something on the order of 20V/km. So for a 5 km long coaxial cable, you're only talking about ~120V of induced potential difference (i.e. the same voltage as a residential plug in the US). When people are analyzing the potential damage from this kind of electromagnetic disturbance (E3 is the term you'll see, based on analysis of nuclear EMP which has other components that you don't see in geomagnetic storms regardless of severity), it's mostly about really long conductors, like on the order of 100km.

6 hours agojohncolanduoni

I missed it (seeing the Aurora) .. are there any reliable alerts for this sort of event, that do not alert me about anything else, but really only such big events?

5 hours agolukan

On iOS there’s an app literally called “Aurora”.

It will notify you when you’re in an area with a high Kp (or above a Kp you specify).

30 minutes agovachina

One caveat is, that these events cannot be forecasted in the same way as weather on earth can. You usually only have a lead time of 15 - 45 minutes. See also https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-tutorial

2 hours agoMrGilbert

Sure. But if I am awake, those 15 minutes are enough to get dressed and go outside.

Yesterday I just would have had to walk to the balkony to see it, but I was busy with some frustrating coding problem instead ..

2 hours agolukan

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/subscription-services

5 hours agocvt7bm

Thanks, that seems exactly what I was looking for. (Now I have to figure out the best way to get a alert to my phone if my inbox receives such a mail, probably easiest to use a a mailadress just for this case and then treat this emailadress different)

5 hours agolukan

PJM had some geomagnetic disturbance warnings, but did not progress to the alert stage or grid re-configuation actions. So, no US power grid problems.

    104955 Warning Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning 01.19.2026 14:30 
    PJM-RTO
    A Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning has been issued for
    14:30 on 01.19.2026 through 16:00 on 01.19.2026 .
    A GMD warning of K8 or greater is in effect for this period. 
    End time: 01.19.2026 16:00 
(All times are prevailing Eastern US time)

I've posted on this before, for other warnings. Not going to repeat that.

14 hours agoAnimats

This page looks like an accessibility nightmare. The entire warning text is an image. There is no transcription present for screen reader users. I did not expect this from a government website.

14 hours agodschuessler

Looking at the aspect ratio (and working in a bank) it's worse than that. That's a powerpoint slide.

14 hours agodelusional

Not like someone with poor vision is going to be able to see the aurora borealis that results

/s

13 hours agodelfinom

Although everyone is interested in visible aurora, the proton flux is also really impressive. It peaked at 37,000 pfu at 1910Z. The highest ever recorded was 43,500 pfu in March 1991.

12 hours agodrmpeg

Australian Bureau of Meteorology advisory for visible aurora: https://www.sws.bom.gov.au/Aurora

13 hours agobashtoni

Are there any resources to track Aurora sightings or predicted sightings?

13 hours agojp0d

At the bottom right of that page is a subscribe link, with a number of different alerts and lists to subscribe to.

13 hours agostubish

Worth noting that Kp, which many talk about in discussions online, is more or less useless for anyone in Australia or the southern hemisphere. Lots of beginner Aurora chasers here get tripped up by that.

What is useful is KAus and the G index, KAus is shown on this page, so thats what i'll be tracking.

12 hours agoaussieguy1234

Is that tonight or last night?

13 hours agohahahahhaah

It was only issued this morning Australian time, so I presume it's for tonight.

12 hours agobashtoni

How rare is this?

G4 storms are ~100 per solar cycle (~11 years).

So roughly 9 G4 events/year on average.

13 hours agoWhitneyLand

But they should mostly be in the same part of the cycle rather than spread evenly.

It probably wouldn't make sense to calculate "average snow days per month" across an entire calendar year (in most places...), this is the same thing.

10 hours agotbrownaw

This is an S4. Last S4 event was in October 2003.

an hour agorapht

This is an S4, though.

5 hours agovelocity3230

Belay that. The G-value was high too.

5 hours agovelocity3230

Like 20-25 years rare according to some space weather youtuber.

12 hours agoburnt-resistor

> some space weather youtuber

Please stop watching that guy, he is a total fraud and knows nothing about physics.

8 hours agocreatonez

Discussion of the event https://community.spaceweatherlive.com/topic/4210-x19-cme/

12 hours agoKunsang

Damn, I love finding some hyper-specific forums like this one.

Sooo much jargon.

4 hours agofnands

This is definitely not a language I speak!

Flux and bZ!

10 hours agoneogodless

Surely you must be familiar with the flux capacitor? ;)

an hour agoimp0cat

Years ago I was concerned about this and made a plan with my wife for what to do if she was at work.

But now we have a bunch of kids in different schools and haven't updated our plan.

Does anyone have a plan for what happens if we have a really bad event?

13 hours agoPlatoIsADisease

A really bad event would be that long-distance transmission lines act like antennas and pick up millions of volts and blow up all the transformers.

I don't know how much you can plan for that other than "if it happens, try to get home", and then all the usual prepper stuff.

13 hours agohnuser123456

Pray for clear skies and go out and watch the beautiful aurora, silly!

Depending on the kids' ages, you can teach them quite a lot about the Earth's magnetic field and why the aurora concentrates at the poles, how the high-energy particles light up the sky (it's a lot like a neon light), and how the atmosphere shields us from any danger despite the spectacular show.

12 hours agomyself248

Feel a bit sensationalistic. It happens, it's not rare, and we've always got on with life perfectly fine.

4 hours agoesskay

Disconnect your telegraph batteries and run on aurora power only

4 hours agointernet_points

For a really bad event that managed to blow a lot of transformers (presumably due to grid operators not seeing it coming) ... well, take up farming.

13 hours agorootusrootus

Buy a bit of extra food and water.

13 hours agoTepix

And toilet paper! Rolls and rolls of toilet paper!

13 hours agoy1n0

First rule of fight club...

13 hours agoswader999

Keep a couple days water and food on hand, go up to the pub, have a pint, and wait for this all to blow over.

13 hours agofuzzer371

With how much modern cars rely on electronics, I would not try to drive during such an event.

13 hours agoJoshTriplett

It’s ok - The Winchester is within walking distance.

13 hours agowhyleyc

Omg i watched this yesterday!

12 hours agojrgd

Solar flares are only dangerous to very long conductors.

13 hours agolxgr

so cancel the limo?

13 hours agoluxuryballs

That's a safety feature. It prevents you from drinking and driving if you go to a pub during a solar flare. :)

12 hours agothrowaway81523

No one would drive to the pub anyway. Better walking back home…

12 hours agojrgd

Valid. I think I have such an ingrained different set of assumptions (a pub being just another kind of place for food, and "going to" anything involving a form of transportation) that that didn't even occur to me.

11 hours agoJoshTriplett

Title says "S4" solar radiation event, but the linked page says "G4" geomagnetic storm

12 hours agonbf_1995

Do you need long exposure to make it visible with a camera? How does that work in the presence of light pollution?

14 hours agoComputerGuru

Tonight I could see the colours without the camera but it definitely stands out more with the long exposure of the camera.

Even with lights in the direct line of the shot you you can get good results - presumably the phone is doing HDR to achieve this.

14 hours agothebruce87m

Local light pollution normally makes it hard to see with anything short of long exposure, but today it was naked eye visible and regular photos also captured it.

13 hours agoMacha

fascinating, hope our critical infrastructure can handle this. how long does something like this last, and will it have an effect on artemis 2?

hypothetical: if a carrington event-esque storm happens during the mission, how badly will the houston <-> orion module communication links be affected?

9 hours agoAnishLaddha

I wonder if we're going to see an aurora over Seattle tonight?

13 hours agoaliljet

Weirdly, while the site in question is "blaring klaxons!" there are more "cool night lights!" posts than concern.

13 hours ago_carbyau_

Unless you're in space, a large scale electrical operator, or relying on HF radio there isn't much reason to be interested other than the lights for a G4 (what this is currently classed as).

13 hours agozamadatix

my Telecaster sure was noisy this morning but I didn't think much of it

10 hours agopvab3

> while the site in question is "blaring klaxons!"

No, it isn't. It clearly says everything is under control but it would be good to keep an eye on it.

13 hours agoguerrilla

Hopefully it's clear space weather for Artemis II coming up. I wonder what they do if it's inclement en route?

13 hours agotigerlily

There's not that much they can do. It's often discussed that if the extreme August 1972 solar storm had overlapped with an Apollo mission (it didn't), it would have acutely sickened the astronauts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_1972_solar_storms#Human...

> "Had a mission been taking place during August, those inside the Apollo command module would have been shielded from 90% of the incoming radiation. However, this reduced dose could still have caused acute radiation sickness if the astronauts were located outside the protective magnetic field of Earth, which was the case for much of a lunar mission. An astronaut engaged in EVA in orbit or on a moonwalk could have experienced severe radiation poisoning, or even absorbed a potentially lethal dose."

The Orion capsule's contingency plan looks something like this:

> "To protect themselves, astronauts will position themselves in the central part of the crew module largely reserved for storing items they’ll need during flight and create a shelter using the stowage bags on board. The method protects the crew by increasing mass directly surrounding them, and therefore making a denser environment that solar particles would have to travel through, while not adding mass to the crew module itself."

https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/orion/scientists-and-e...

12 hours agoperihelions

For All Mankind “illustrated” a solar storm at surface-level of the moon, including “boiling” regolith. I wonder how embellished this was, or whether particle bombardment would actually cause this.

My mind goes to the working mechanism of eidophor projectors, where oil on the projection bowl does indeed deform under electron beam exposure.

6 hours agoxattt

I'll be going out tonight if this continues into Australian night time hours.

At this strength, I could see the full display including colors with my naked eye in Melbourne, May 11th 2024. This storm is slightly stronger than that event.

13 hours agoaussieguy1234

I'll be attempting to get some photos/footage from Esperance.

5 hours agoikr678

There's a high triple threat bar for Astro photos sourced from Western Australia.

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110529.html

If you manage to pull off the Aurora Australis above a triple curl at The Right with a shark body surfing into the green room ... the internet will explode.

4 hours agodefrost

I live somewhat close to the arctic circle and the aurora has been exceptional lately. One recent evening it looked like there was a massive city behind the cloud cover, and a few nights before when the sky was clear I watched enormous green flames for hours.

5 hours agocess11

Possible aurora visible through central US tonight

15 hours agouticus

What strength would destroy the sensor?

3 hours agobrador

It seems that the peak was several hours ago, and I haven't observed any effects from it...

14 hours agozahlman

The peak was originally supposed to be 6-7 hours from now... it's still showing KP 8 here though, so I'm not sure what's going on. It could get more intense.

13 hours agoguerrilla

Darn Montreal is still too south. Wish I were in Winnipeg.

13 hours agoferguess_k

any effects on the human body??

11 hours agoanon115

Depends. If you're outside at night and tilt your head up, the Default Mode Network of your brain may be temporarily suppressed, while dopamine may increase.

4 hours agointernet_points

We never get aurora in Japan :(

13 hours agotramtrist

Probably a stupid question, but should I unplug my EV? (UK)

13 hours agocbeach

No need. Wrong type of solar event. You might be able to see auroras, though. I saw some a couple of hours ago.

13 hours agoqayxc

Yes! Absolutely, but only if you want to drive it.

9 hours ago_blk

No.

13 hours agojacquesm

Nice. And it's somewhat relieving to read this over a Starlink connection.

9 hours ago_blk

Up to G-5 possibly. Cell phone visible in dark areas throughout most of CONUS.

It was mentioned that air travel ionizing radiation exposure increases during geomagnetic storms. I'd consider pausing travel for a couple of days to not be a guinea pig because there's not enough data to consider it safe. If anyone absolutely must fly tonight, it'd be interesting if they were to take a high sensitivity dosimeter to see what happens.

12 hours agoburnt-resistor

Not sure how to deal with this kind of wildly unbalanced risk assessment

4 hours agogarbagewoman

TL;DR: A severe (G4-level) geomagnetic storm hit Earth on January 19, 2026 due to a solar coronal mass ejection. It can disrupt power grids, GPS, satellite systems, and radio communications, while creating visible aurora displays at higher latitudes.

9 hours agosparin9
[deleted]
16 hours ago

[dead]

an hour agohindustanuday

[flagged]