We can argue that stealing at planetary scale is something innovative. Of course it still is theft, but at this scale is something without precedent.
Intellectual property is ontologically incoherent. Stealing IP isn't possible because IP is a legal construct, not something that exists in the natural world nor in reality.
I'm curious why you have a licensing agreement in your "about" if IP isn't real.
So I can do very silly things with the law when my comments end up used for commercial purposes.
The point is to highlight the contradiction, not to avoid it.
We can argue that stealing at planetary scale is something innovative. Of course it still is theft, but at this scale is something without precedent.
Intellectual property is ontologically incoherent. Stealing IP isn't possible because IP is a legal construct, not something that exists in the natural world nor in reality.
I'm curious why you have a licensing agreement in your "about" if IP isn't real.
So I can do very silly things with the law when my comments end up used for commercial purposes.
The point is to highlight the contradiction, not to avoid it.