A little ironic that the README, SPEC.md and the poster's comment here all smell of LLM writing!
Given the reality that there are a lot of people who [fairly or unfairly] judge anything that uses "AI" in a decisively negative way, what possible advantage is there in giving people a reason to dismiss your project without evaluating it on its own merits?
(1) Why?
(2) The code I write with AI doesn’t fit on the scale.
AIx is an open standard for disclosing AI involvement in software projects - expressed through the language of authorship. Not a judgment. Just transparency.
Just one tiny issue:
"AIX®" is also a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and used for the AIX® operating system that is still in use today.
A little ironic that the README, SPEC.md and the poster's comment here all smell of LLM writing!
Given the reality that there are a lot of people who [fairly or unfairly] judge anything that uses "AI" in a decisively negative way, what possible advantage is there in giving people a reason to dismiss your project without evaluating it on its own merits?
(1) Why?
(2) The code I write with AI doesn’t fit on the scale.
AIx is an open standard for disclosing AI involvement in software projects - expressed through the language of authorship. Not a judgment. Just transparency.
Just one tiny issue:
"AIX®" is also a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and used for the AIX® operating system that is still in use today.
I would be careful to use that name.
Thanks. renamed it to https://github.com/QAInsights/Quillx
Neat idea. I like the five point scale