Fyi the unscented Kalman filter is both easier to implement than the EKF, and also avoids several of the requirements that come along with the need to linearize (such as the differentiability requirement mentioned in the article). Also (to me, at least) the UKF is conceptually much cleaner, as the whole point is to place the approximation in the parameterization of the distribution, rather than on the function operating on that distribution.
Pilling on to say well done on the interactivity and visuals / design overall. I'm working to make producing posts like this universally accessible (http://motate.app/) and posts like yours are an inspiration.
[deleted]
Really well written article, thank you!
nice work! the interactive visuals are really cool
I love a blog post with interaction
love seeing purdue hackers folks on hackernews :)
I was going to say the same thing.
Purdue Hackers has grown into a much needed space at Purdue, nice to see the effects going beyond.
Fyi the unscented Kalman filter is both easier to implement than the EKF, and also avoids several of the requirements that come along with the need to linearize (such as the differentiability requirement mentioned in the article). Also (to me, at least) the UKF is conceptually much cleaner, as the whole point is to place the approximation in the parameterization of the distribution, rather than on the function operating on that distribution.
https://groups.seas.harvard.edu/courses/cs281/papers/unscent...
Pilling on to say well done on the interactivity and visuals / design overall. I'm working to make producing posts like this universally accessible (http://motate.app/) and posts like yours are an inspiration.
Really well written article, thank you!
nice work! the interactive visuals are really cool
I love a blog post with interaction
love seeing purdue hackers folks on hackernews :)
I was going to say the same thing. Purdue Hackers has grown into a much needed space at Purdue, nice to see the effects going beyond.