What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
I can only see the first couple of paragraphs, but it's OpenAI following in the footsteps of every other company that doesn't have a viable product: litigation.
If I’m reading this correctly, OpenAI is upset because Apple hasn’t made their features visible enough yet.
Which seems like a bonkers reason to try and sue, and one which could backfire spectacularly on them, if Apple sends people into court to testify under oath that OpenAI’s features didn’t ship because they didn’t meet quality bars.
It sounds like Apple is re-learning the lesson that relying on a 3rd party can be a liability.
The article makes it sound like OpenAI is really entitled in this one. Also legal action is obviously going to be a strong signal of OpenAI's friendliness /s.
What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
I can only see the first couple of paragraphs, but it's OpenAI following in the footsteps of every other company that doesn't have a viable product: litigation.
If I’m reading this correctly, OpenAI is upset because Apple hasn’t made their features visible enough yet.
Which seems like a bonkers reason to try and sue, and one which could backfire spectacularly on them, if Apple sends people into court to testify under oath that OpenAI’s features didn’t ship because they didn’t meet quality bars.
It sounds like Apple is re-learning the lesson that relying on a 3rd party can be a liability.
https://archive.is/Ingcu
The article makes it sound like OpenAI is really entitled in this one. Also legal action is obviously going to be a strong signal of OpenAI's friendliness /s.