I packaged 171 reasoning methodologies as executable Claude Code skills — logic, probability, decision analysis, game theory, ethics, systems thinking, creative techniques, strategy, and more. Each skill is a complete procedure derived from a specific thinker's framework (Tetlock's forecasting calibration, Klein's premortem, de Bono's lateral thinking, Rawls' veil of ignorance, etc.), not a vague prompt.
The entry point is /think — describe your situation in plain language, and it routes to the right methodology. Or invoke any skill directly: /logic-check, /decision-premortem-analysis, /ethics-council, /probability-confidence-calibration.
Astonishing — there are so many skills to choose from. What do you think about this idea? It's very interesting.
Why not add a little prefix to them all?
Like /sfh-*
I agree. Without a prefix, it is indeed difficult to find skills, and there may be skill name conflicts.
I packaged 171 reasoning methodologies as executable Claude Code skills — logic, probability, decision analysis, game theory, ethics, systems thinking, creative techniques, strategy, and more. Each skill is a complete procedure derived from a specific thinker's framework (Tetlock's forecasting calibration, Klein's premortem, de Bono's lateral thinking, Rawls' veil of ignorance, etc.), not a vague prompt.
The entry point is /think — describe your situation in plain language, and it routes to the right methodology. Or invoke any skill directly: /logic-check, /decision-premortem-analysis, /ethics-council, /probability-confidence-calibration.
Astonishing — there are so many skills to choose from. What do you think about this idea? It's very interesting.
Why not add a little prefix to them all?
Like /sfh-*
I agree. Without a prefix, it is indeed difficult to find skills, and there may be skill name conflicts.
Awesome.
[flagged]
[flagged]