33A discovery about GCC's unidirectional rotation algorithmLooking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principlesgcc is gone, like clang. Those are c++ abominations. Not worth more than /opt.Prefer, tinycc, cproc, scc, assembly.'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole.This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly!Struck by (his) Poes I suppose.Happens to the best of us :-)Gee I wonder why Raymond would do thatI have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.Try again? You don't really need context here.Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xDHe found that gambling was going on in here!
Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles
gcc is gone, like clang. Those are c++ abominations. Not worth more than /opt.Prefer, tinycc, cproc, scc, assembly.
'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole.This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly!Struck by (his) Poes I suppose.Happens to the best of us :-)Gee I wonder why Raymond would do thatI have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.Try again? You don't really need context here.Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xDHe found that gambling was going on in here!
This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly!Struck by (his) Poes I suppose.Happens to the best of us :-)
Gee I wonder why Raymond would do thatI have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.Try again? You don't really need context here.Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xD
I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.Try again? You don't really need context here.Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xD
Try again? You don't really need context here.Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xD
Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles
gcc is gone, like clang. Those are c++ abominations. Not worth more than /opt.
Prefer, tinycc, cproc, scc, assembly.
'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole.
This is obviously humor.
You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly!
Struck by (his) Poes I suppose.
Happens to the best of us :-)
Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that
I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.
Try again? You don't really need context here.
Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you."
You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole."
Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xD
He found that gambling was going on in here!